A popular view in the history of anthropology identifies Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) as a primary source of the idea of cultural relativism. More recent scholarship notes Herders deployment of Kultur in the singular, along with very conventional Enlightenment assumptions, including universal criteria from which to judge other civilizations. Far from diminishing Herders status, however, these Enlightenment sensibilities are celebrated: respect for cultural specificity does not cancel out the universalizing, transcultural thrust of concepts like progress and ethical judgment, according to David Denby. I argue that such a reading is anachronistic by placing Herder in the universal-relative hand-wringing of todays cultural anthropologists. Herders Kette der Kultur promotes the idea that all peoples of the world express different stages of universal history relative to a single divine will. Moreover, the individual is the creative force behind the difference of nations and not vice versa. Not only do these points disqualify Herder as a pioneer of anthropology, but more importantly the focus on Enlightenment figures like Herder has acted as a distraction to a proper intellectual history initiated by George Stocking in the 1960s of the concept pluralized by Franz Boas - namely, culture.
↧